Eric Norberg, Editor & General Manager
Cheryl Duval, Advertising Design
Molly Filler, Supervisor of Page Design
Jerrin Sipe, Accounting

News Reporting & Display Advertising:
fax: 503/232-9787

"Community Classifieds" want ads: 503/620-7355
Circulation/subscriptions: 503/620-9797
Accounting/Billing: 971/204-7712
Composition: 971/204-7836
Community Newspapers, Inc.

Editorial and Sales Address:
1837 S.E. Harold St, Portland, OR 97202-4932
Remit bill payments to:
Accounts Receivable Department
P.O. Box 22109, Portland, OR 97269-2109



November 2019 -- Vol. 114, No. 3
Scroll down to read this issue!

Memories of THE BEE's first 100 years!
In 2006, THE BEE celebrated its centennial of serving Southeast Portland!  A special four-page retrospective of Inner Southeast Portland's century, written by Eileen Fitzsimons, and drawn from the pages of THE BEE over the previous 100 years, appeared in our September, 2006, issue.
Click here to read the special centenary retrospective!


Next BEE is our Thanksgiving/December
issue, with a deadline of November 14.
(The Pre-Christmas/January issue has an ad and copy deadline of December 5.)


Want to subscribe to receive the PRINT version of THE BEE?
E-mail -- or telephone 503/620-9797, during weekday business hours.
The 12-issue annual subscription rate is $14 per year for addresses located in Multnomah County, Oregon; and $24 for anywhere else in the U.S.(it's based on the differential postage rates for our class of postage). For international rates, inquire via the e-mail address or telephone number just above!


Daily news! 
The all-new daily PORTLAND TRIBUNE website  is updated throughout the day, every day, when news breaks out. 
Click the banner at left to keep up to date on the banner news throughout the Rose City!

THE BEE has a second website -- it's searchable for past stories.  The content for the current month is similar to this one, presented in a different format.  To visit the other website, click the banner at right!

GDPR NOTICE: The owner of this website,, collects no information on this site from any reader, and never has.

Code Change, Portland City Council, public hearing, Brentwood Darlington, Southeast, Portland, Oregon
Neighbors seek answers about the Portland Office of Community & Civic Life’s controversial “Code Change 3.96” project, at the Brentwood-Darlington meeting featuring the Bureau’s Director, Suk Rhee; Commissioner Chloe Eudaly Policy Advisor Winta Yohannes; and OCCL Code Change Project Manager Sabrina Wilson – moderated by BDNA Chair Chelsea Powers, at right. (Photo by David F. Ashton)

SE ‘Code Change’ meeting: Heat – but little light


An effort to clarify the City of Portland’s Office of Community & Civic Life (OCCL) “Code Change 3.96” project, leaders of the Brentwood-Darlington Neighborhood Association (BDNA) invited the Bureau’s Director, Suk Rhee, for a conversation on Tuesday evening, September 24, in the Brentwood Darlington Community Center.

Since officials of OCCL have charged they are frequently misquoted in the press, THE BEE recorded the statements made at the meeting, and present them here, verbatim.

Rhee brought with her Commissioner Chloe Eudaly’s Policy Advisor Winta Yohannes, and OCCL Code Change Project Manager Sabrina Wilson, to join her on the panel.

BDNA Chair Chelsea Powers, who served as the meeting’s moderator, began the meeting with a brief presentation that outlined the efforts to make their neighborhood association inclusive and responsive to all neighbors, with volunteer efforts “providing nearly $100,000 in free labor each year to help the city connect with residents in this geographic location.”

OCCL Code Change Project Manager Sabrina Wilson extolled the virtues of their Code Change “process”, and stepped through a Code Change presentation.

Surprising many, Commissioner Eudaly’s policy advisor Winta Yohannes announced, “These [Code Change] components will still come to [the Portland City] Council, but we’re finding there are still conversations we need to have in the community.

“And, in the new Code language and in the conversation that we’re going to have, none of this is a zero-sum, you know, a proposition; we’re really talking about how we do increase involvement, which will involved in changing the structure,” Yohannes went on. “It’s not just adding to a current structure; but, to allow for that, and to allow for a more meaningful Counsel conversation. So what you can expect is that on November 14 there will not be a vote on the new Code language ...”

The day after this meeting, September 25, Commissioner Eudaly sent out a notice confirming Yohannes’ statement. Notwithstanding that OCCL’s change of the City Code that would, among other changes, effectively remove the support [and recognized city status] of neighborhood associations, she confirmed that it would not be put to a vote of the Portland City Council in November.

Several Southeast Portland neighbors who attended the Brentwood-Darlington meeting shared strong feelings about what was heard – and, what was not said – in it; adding that they had found most replies to their questions to be convoluted – or, at times, incomprehensible.

For example, to a question about the OCCL’s Code Change apparently wiping neighborhood associations from the Code, Rhee responded:

“... about adding or deleting groups; I want to make very, very clear that in [the Code Section] ‘060’ only Council can add or delete groups. The administrative rule that’ll be presented the same day, whether for discussing on November 14 or later, actually says is ‘everyone in the known universe’. These are all the associations we know of, is the coalitions we know of, these are the business districts – everyone we know now is actually presenting to this administrative rule and with this code that they come together.

“So, and those groups have their rights and those privileges preserved,” Rhee continued. “The only way we can add or delete to that group is by Council Ordinance. So, there is information out there that only the Bureau Director will be able to add – that is not true. After the current version of the [unintelligible] on our website, only Council can add or delete; I want to be clear about that.”

Asked about rules and standards for groups recognized by the city being discontinued, Rhee responded:

“...talking about rules and standards, et cetera; we’ll get back to that. Basically our overall response is that this: It’s about government reducing as many barriers to participation, especially for volunteer groups that have not had traditional access to government, and so, what we’re trying to do is lower all of the barriers as much as we can to civic engagement participation; and we will build them back up, not with barriers, but with eligibility and requirements – as they are needed – particularly when there is money involved, but also when there is something bigger at state.

“But of all the many things that you talked about that you’ve achieved as a neighborhood association, some of them do not require vetting by City Council or our Bureau – it only requires support. And we should be supportive the [BDNA Hallowe’en] ‘Spook-Tacular’ event, but we don’t know how to run your committee meetings,” remarked Rhee. “But if there’s money involved, we may want to ask pertinent questions, especially when there’s other privileges or even more dollars involved, you’d better believe that the city will provide eligibility and other requirements.

“But in general, we want to say, have you ever seen that question, ‘No wrong door?’” continued Rhee. “Government should feel like that, ‘no wrong door’ – but you’ve come to the ‘right door’ to reduce the barriers to civic engagement for all groups; and then, when you get there, we ask what you want to do – then maybe will help you get to this or another place, and at this other place you need may need more vetting. We want to create this ‘no wrong door’, reducing barriers participation as much as we can; and then when it matters, if it’s benefits money or privileges, we will put those screens in those areas. Does that make sense?”

Open letters posted by many neighborhood associations have stated agreement with the effort for their organizations, and the City in general, to better connect with all Portlanders. The question put to Rhee was: “Given that broad consensus, how do you think this became so controversial?”

Rhee began by lambasting the Oregonian, Portland Tribune, and Willamette Week for inaccurate reporting.

“So, if you heard [in news media, flyers, or NextDoor] that the neighbor associations can be dismantled, and the insurance is going to be taken away ... that we don’t value you, that’s part of the controversy – because sometimes the conversation started, not with us or with the facts, but actually with some scary ideas.

“... I also think we have to ask for whom this is controversial,” Rhee continued “For many it is not, and for some I think we have to ... identify and share with us, why it is controversial to them, if most of the time it’s prefaced with ‘we really value the equity and the social inclusion outcome’ that we really want to achieve.

“So, we have to ask for whom it is controversial, because for many it is not, for many people in the neighborhood associations, and within the city is actually told us this is long overdue, this is catching up to reality, and this is actually more of the accurate statement of who we are as Portlanders than what there has been,” Rhee said. “I think those are two elements of it; but not all of them.”

During the meeting, Woodstock Neighborhood Association Chair Sage Jensen – speaking for herself, not officially for her organization – asserted that, as a group, they agree with “the spirit of the OCCL is trying to do.

“But, while many of us do agree that these changes for equity, inclusion, and diversity need to be made, the way that it is being done is incredibly sloppy,” Jensen continued. “The process has not included any feedback from the neighborhood associations that I know of, including the WNA.

“While I want you to take to heart that a lot of us want to see more opportunities for diversity and inclusion in neighborhood associations, and part of this process may be ‘Code Change’, I think you have to go back and do a better job,” Jensen said.

Rhee replied:

“Thank you for being so honest. We definitely did miss some neighborhood associations in our outreach. And, that is something we’re trying to figure out where it is on our [unintelligible] … I apologize to you.

“And, we also have to say, when you look at our survey results, we look at our February [Code Change] meetings, and the actions at our April meeting, we actually saw, because you could look at [unintelligible] results, they’re actually on the website with all the results – there were neighborhood associations’ perspectives proudly represented there,” Rhee asserted, defending the program’s inclusion of neighborhood association input. “And so we sought in our survey, and then in all the February [meetings] and the English language gathering at Parkrose, it was almost all neighborhood associations.”

Rhee restated that information about the survey and meetings were on their website adding, “On the committee there, are five neighborhood association neighbors, two of them are from the Coalitions.”

THE BEE, then checked the “Committee 3.96 Members” biographies, and found that Rhee’s statement was problematical regarding “five neighborhood association neighbors”. The only member with a specific neighborhood association connection – other than one member admitting to residing within a neighborhood association’s boundaries – appeared to be Laura Young, Board Chair of Cully Association of Neighbors. Coalition members listed are former Southeast Uplift Co-Chair Linda Nettekoven, and the Coalition’s former Director, Molly Mayo.

Rhee continued:

“... The Southeast Uplift Director was on the committee, and put it on their Board agenda; and, every Coalition is pushing it out, so, I’m just saying, both: Apologies for missing some or many of you, truly. And, we have seen and benefited from neighborhood association perspectives, because they are through all throughout our data that we took and that we presented, and so please do not completely feel the neighborhood associations were not represented, because, read the data.”

Neighbors respond to the meeting
In the days following the meeting several attendees commented on their experience of the two-hour session. In each case, the individual is giving THE BEE their personal opinions and not speaking for any group or organization.

Stephenie Frederick, BDNA Board Member
“After listening to the three panelists make presentations and respond to audience questions, I came away no more edified than I was previously.

“What I saw at the meeting is a desire to destroy a longstanding civic structure without offering any kind of replacement structure or [organizational] standards,” said Frederick. “In their official role of geo-connection, the neighborhood associations must continue to abide by public-meeting laws.

“Further, Ms. Rhee promises that OCCL will create detailed processes and policies later on, after City Council adopts the proposed code. Can we rely on an equitable and democratic roll-out, given that, in Section 050, OCCL assigns a huge amount of power to itself? I don’t accept Ms. Rhee’s promises for a second.

“In summary, that forum served only to confirm my opinion that we are looking at autocratic power-grabbing, not professional management; a messy, sloppy rush to destroy rather than mediate intelligent transition is not acceptable, but that’s what’s happening,”

Chelsea Powers, BDNA Chair
“Director Rhee’s replies at our meeting did not provide any additional clarity. And, after hearing from Rhee, I do not feel neighborhood associations will continue to be supported under the proposed changes.

“I am also still waiting on their answers to neighbors' questions they promised to send us, so we can post them on our website,” she added.

“The small tweaks they have made have not altered the Code Change content meaningfully. The lack of clarity on requirements of groups’ standards, such as open meeting rules concerning notifications or funding, is extremely concerning, as is how departments within OCCL are being dismantled,” Powers said.

“On another note, I am concerned because OCCL is pushing our neighborhood coalitions to support a one year contract extension on short notice.”

Pete Forsyth, President, South Tabor Neighborhood Association
Asked why he took away from the meeting, Forsythe said, “I felt that Suk Rhee and her colleagues are working hard to gain some measure of acceptance of the work product produced by the Code Change Committee, Commissioner Eudaly's office, and OCCL staff.

“They have made adjustments to the proposal and to their messaging around it in good faith, but I believe the adjustments fall far short of what is needed.”

After the meeting Forsythe also told THE BEE he had “no confidence” that neighborhood associations will continue to be recognized and supported.

“As Commissioner Eudaly’s staffmember announced, it appears that the Commissioner also does not have confidence that the proposal is ready for consideration by the City Council. But I did not learn much in the meeting about what will be done to modify it further, or whether the already-modified proposal will be given consideration by the committee that signed off on the original proposal,” Forsythe pointed out.

Gail Kiely, BDNA Board Member
“I don't think Rhee understands why we are so frustrated; all we want is clarity. Despite reassurances from her that ‘nothing will change’, I suspect when it comes to dealing with City Council and money, neighborhood associations get shortchanged.

“I want to believe that the Code is changing for the better, but somehow; but, I just don't trust them,” Kiely said.

Lizzy Caston, Tabor South neighbor
“I took away from the meeting that the Code Change project – its process, management, and communications regarding it from Eudaly and the OCCL – is a ‘hot mess’ of government dysfunction.

“It has been framed by City leadership in a way that has unfairly and wrongly pits our communities against one another, as if to say, ‘You are either for the Code Change or you are against equity and diversity’. Setting this up as ‘Neighborhood Associations vs. Diversity’ destroys trust in our local government as fair and steady stewards of public process, and is damaging to our community and city,” commented Caston.

Mary Ann Schwab, Sunnyside resident, and Spirit of Portland recipient
Her take on the meeting: “The 3.96.060 Code keeps changing! When Suk Rhee was asked in the meeting why OCCL stopped using Roberts Rules of Order – requiring open meetings, discussion, and taking minutes – she responded in substance: ‘In that so many cultures cannot relate to Roberts Rules of Order – it is not really necessary.’ Instead, Rhee quickly went on to address how Neighborhood Associations need to protect the environment by stopping the use of plastic straws!

“The proposed Code Change eliminates the formal recognition of neighborhood associations that is premised on compliance with the ‘Standards and Open Meetings’ rules,” Schwab observed.

The long-time neighborhood advocate concluded, “Mayor Wheeler’s Budget 2020 will dictate how many OCCL employees will be serving Portlanders. It is City Council who must review and change the City Charter, Code 3.96.060. The City Charter is scheduled to be reviewed in 2021. So, why is Commissioner Chloe Eudaly in such a rush to eliminate 92% of the City Charter 3.96.060 Code? Who really benefits?”

Finally, about the November 14 Code Change meeting with the Portland City Council: a City Hall insider told this reporter, “It isn’t going to happen.” It is unclear if that means there will be no meeting, or there will be a meeting but with no vote taken at that time.

Dairy Queen, closes, Westmoreland, wake with candles, Southeast Portland, Oregon
Expressing the sentiments felt by everyone arriving on DQ’s closing night, a small group gathered in front of the restaurant with lit candles, while Olivia Rockwood read her “eulogy and tribute” to the 50+ year old family fast food restaurant. (Courtesy of Olivia Rockwood)

End comes for Westmoreland’s Dairy Queen

Editor, THE BEE

We knew it was coming; the story was in THE BEE earlier this year: The land under the Westmoreland Dairy Queen had been sold; a Chase Bank would replace it on the corner of S.E. Tolman and Milwaukie Avenue. But we had hoped it would not come quite this soon.

But come it did, at closing time on Monday, September 30, as the note posted on the door that day revealed.

Dairy Queen, Westmoreland, Portland, Oregon, closes
As twilight approached, on the last day of the Westmoreland Dairy Queen, there was a farewell message on the elevated signpost outside. (Photo by Eric Norberg)

Shortly after 6 p.m., families and customers began to accumulate, and shortly the ordering line extended out the door into the patio dining area – and those in that line waited patiently for a half hour or more, despite the cold temperature – the coolest evening since last April – for the chance to order at the counter one last time.

When customers reached the counter, some of the menu options had run out. If what someone wanted to order was no longer available, they’d order something else. It was a chance to enjoy one last time the only remaining traditional family fast-food restaurant in the Sellwood-Westmoreland neighborhood, after the closing of the Sellwood’s “Mike’s Drive-In” a couple of years ago. And after that night, there would be none at all. Some said the neighborhood was the poorer for it.

Operations Manager Mike Caravatta posted the staff’s goodbye in a sign on the door. Customers chatted with each other in that line, remembering details and experiences from the past in this family restaurant that had been on that spot for over half a century. One remembered that as late as the 1980s there had been limited dining area, and customers had to order at a window while standing outside. The drive-through lane – in which many cars extending down south down Milwaukie Avenue were also waiting – was added later.

At one point in midevening a small group gathered with lit candles, while one of their group, Olivia Rockwood, read a tribute she had prepared:

                                 Eulogy / Ode to Dairy Queen

Thank you all for coming. We’re here to celebrate a life tonight – the life of the 1610 S.E. Tolman Dairy Queen.

For some, this was our place of teenage employment.

For some, it was the reward of a “hot eat and cool treat” after a winning baseball game, or the promise of comfort after a particularly bad school test.

For some, it was chocolate Xtreme Blizzard and hot fudge sundae, symbolizing precious time spent with grandp

For all, it was a safe haven of adolescence, and the best soft-serve in all of Portland.

We hear that our beloved DQ has been bought by a bank and that today is her last day. . .  Life is full of uncertainties.

But what we do know is that no new building could ever take away the humming nostalgia of Blizzard machine, or the faded thank-you posters from the second-grade field trips of yesteryear. But especially, nothing could ever take away our memories of this Portland gem.

It is still possible to visit Mike’s Drive-In of course, and THE BEE stops by there every week: But it’s in Milwaukie, over two miles away, at Harrison Street and Highway 224. And it’s still possible to visit a Dairy Queen, too – there’s one on S.E. Duke Street, six blocks east of 52nd Avenue; and another on S.E. Division Street across from Atkinson Elementary School and north of Franklin High. When Westmorelanders feel like a Blizzard or a Flame Burger or D.Q. chicken strips, they’ll now just have to drive over to other neighborhoods.

But, within Sellwood and Westmoreland, for all its rising trendiness, it is no longer possible to grab a burger and visit with a cross section of the community at a casual family fast-food restaurant. For many, that’s a real loss for the neighborhood.

Don’t miss Dana Beck’s retrospective on the Westmoreland Dairy Queen elsewhere in this issue of THE BEE.

Portland Marathon, Inner Southeast Portland, Oregon
Here are some of the five thousand 2019 Portland Marathon runners, heading east across the Sellwood Bridge. (Photo by David F. Ashton)

Portland Marathoners jog Inner Southeast Portland


For the first time ever, participants in the Portland Marathon – and its associated Half Marathon – were routed through Inner Southeast Portland neighborhoods this year. It happened on Sunday morning, October 4, to the delight of many – including those who created “Neighborhood Cheer Challenge” teams to compete for recognition.

Not all were delighted: Early morning motorists were surprised to find the westbound Sellwood Bridge travel lanes closed, and many other streets normally used to exit and enter the Inner Southeast neighborhoods closed as well, until past noon – as Marathon participants passed through the Sellwood, Westmoreland, Eastmoreland, and Reed neighborhoods that morning. The route went by Sellwood Park and Westmoreland Park, before heading through the Brooklyn neighborhood and crossing S.E. Powell Boulevard northbound.

Surprisingly, of all the neighborhoods in the city through which the runners traveled, four of the five top vote-getters for “Cheer Challenge” prizes – for cheering on the runners – were in Inner Southeast.

After the race, all of the participants were sent an e-mail ballot, asking them to vote in the “Neighborhood Cheer Challenge” – and the Brooklyn Action Corps neighborhood association took first place. (See the sidebar article by Rita Leonard directly below.)

Also receiving Neighborhood Cheer Challenge trophies, and a $500 gift, were the Eastmoreland Neighborhood Association, the Foster-Powell Neighborhood Association, and the Sellwood Moreland Improvement League (SMILE). Another Southeast Portland neighborhood, the Buckman Community Association, was also a winner.

Eastmoreland neighbors were happy to learn that their neighborhood had been selected to win a trophy; volunteers along S.E. Reed College Place set out refreshment stations, made large welcome banners, rang cowbells, and cheered on the runners.

When SMILE Transportation Committee Chair Scott Kelly was contacted by the marathon’s Jared Rohatinsky about the award, he said he was surprised.

“Even though SMILE didn’t officially participate in the ‘Marathon Neighborhood Cheer Challenge’, and we weren’t even listed on the ballots on which the runners voted for the best neighborhood – SMILE was voted one of the best cheer neighborhoods,” Kelly remarked. “I’m happy – not just for the donation, but also that so many folks along the route came out to cheer. It sure was fun to watch!”

And, even though the race course didn’t actually go through the Foster-Powell neighborhood, they won a Cheer Challenge trophy and cash – quite likely thanks to the members of the energetic “FOPO RUN CLUB”, who were stationed at the east end of the Sellwood Bridge.

Since, of the runners pressed for an opinion, all said they really liked the new route better than previous routes – even Mayor Wheeler, who participated in the race, made that comment – it should not be a surprise if Inner Southeast is on the route of the Marathon again next year.

Brooklyn wins top prize in Marathon ‘Neighborhood Cheer Challenge’


As she reported the result, Cheryl Crowe channeled her neighbors’ enthusiasm for cheering Portland Marathon runners as they ran through Brooklyn, on their way to the finish of the race.

At a meeting of the Brooklyn Action Corps, Crowe revealed that the OHSU “Neighborhood Cheer Challenge” promised to donate funds to the community that displayed the most enthusiasm for runners’ efforts, and in the subsequent ballot filled out by the race’s participants, Brooklyn won the top kprize in the city of $1,000!

Brooklyn neighbors participated in a variety of ways. Some gathered in groups, with bells, tambourines, and vocal cheers; others held balloons, and gave high fives; yet others handed out water and snacks at the Aid Station; and a few even ran alongside competitors, urging them to persist up the steep slope of S.E. Franklin Street.

At the Aid Station, volunteers reported that the Marathon had provided a donation to help fund Brooklyn’s Summer Youth Program in Brooklyn Park.

Earlier in the week, some businesses along Milwaukie Avenue decorated their storefronts with murals and other signs of support. Neighbors also gathered about a week prior to the race to create an eye-catching collection of amusing and encouraging signs to post along the Marathon route.

At Rose City Coffee Company, volunteer musicians from Artichoke Music gathered to present live music for the passing crowds. Organized by volunteer Ed Rosney, the groups included the Martingale Band; Bass Pancake, a jazz combo of Cleveland High Students; The Oregon Mandolin Orchestra; and The True Bluesers.

And it was through all these efforts that the Brooklyn neighborhood garnered the most impressive response cheering for the runners, and the top prize in the citywide contest.

Mark Lindsay, Louiie Louie, Oregon Music Hall of Fame, Aladdin Theater, Brooklyn, Southeast Portland, Oregon
An award recipient this year, Mark Lindsay, center, led the band on stage (and the crowd) in an energetic performance of “Louie Louie” to climax the Oregon Music Hall of Fame show in the Brooklyn neighborhood this year. (Photo by David F. Ashton)

‘Oregon Music Hall of Fame’ induction ceremony rocks Brooklyn


Southeast Portland was again the location of the Oregon celebration of its music icons last month. The marquee of Brooklyn’s Aladdin Theater, on Milwaukie Avenue half a block south of Powell Boulevard, was lit up on Saturday night, October 12 – announcing the Oregon Music Hall of Fame (OMHOF) 2019 Hall of Fame Awards and Concert inside.

“Can you believe we’re now in our 13th year!” exclaimed OMHOF co-founder Janeen Rundle. She is also the organization’s current Director of College Scholarships, and Music Education Programs in Schools.

“That’s quite an achievement, considering that OMHOF is a nonprofit organization with all-volunteer Board Members,” Rundle reflected in the theater’s lobby, as a “Who’s Who” of Oregon music swirled around her.

“All the effort that so many people put into this is because we want to maintain Oregon’s musical legacy – and, at the same time, to give kids the opportunity to learn music and play it,” Rundle explained.

Oregon Music Hall of Fame, school benefit, fundraiser, Janeen Rundle, big check, Aladdin Theater, Brooklyn neighborhood, Southeast Portland, Oregon
Here, showing a giant check that expresses the cumulative funds Oregon Music Hall of Fame has raised for Oregon school music education, was the nonprofit’s co-founder, Janeen Rundle. (Photo by David F. Ashton)

Specifically, the organization has presented music education programs in Oregon public schools that don’t have music programs, thereby reaching more than 5,000 students – and annually it grants four $2,500 scholarships to high school seniors who are going on to music education at a higher level.

Through ticket sales, the auctioning of a star-signed guitar (and an accordion), and grants, they expected to raise about $20,000 that evening. As a giant check held aloft on the stage by Ms. Rundle attested, the total raised over the years for its school programs is well over ten times that.

The award show was again hosted by local celebrity Tony Starlight, who began by introducing OMHOF Board Member, and the president of the Music Millennium store on Burnside Street, Terry Currier.

“By being in the Aladdin Theater tonight you’re supporting music education in the State of Oregon,” Currier told the audience. “There actually is a physical location for the Oregon Music Hall of Fame: It’s located in West Linn; and there’s a kiosk with photos and information on all the inductees from the past in the ‘Community Music Project’ building.”

To qualify for the ballot at theses annual awards, a musician, act, or industry candidate must either be from Oregon and a music professional for 20 years – or, must have moved to Oregon and then been a music professional here for at least 20 years from that point on, Currier explained.

Among the induction concert performers, the audience was entertained by the music of Little Sue and her band, Michael Hurley and Friends, and the bands Sequel, and Pond.

The 2019 “Artist of the Year” was Ural Thomas & the Pain; the “Album of the Year” was The Decemberists’ “I’ll Be Your Girl”. And the artists inducted were 3 Leg Torso, Dick Berk, Little Sue, Mark Lindsay, Michael Allen Harrison, Michael Hurley, and Pond. “Side players” Joanna Bole and John Mazzocco were also inducted.

To the surprise of some, during the live auction, an accordion signed and donated by “Weird Al” Yankovic received the highest bid of any item offered.

After nationally-famous singer Mark Lindsay of Paul Revere and the Raiders was inducted into the Oregon Music Hall of Fame, the evening ended with Lindsay and a “super group” of musicians – including guitarist Steve West, also of Paul Revere and the Raiders – jamming on “Louie, Louie”, a song recorded and released by the Raiders prior to the Kingsmen’s better-known version. The Kingsmen were previously inducted.

Learn more about the musicians and music industry folks honored this year by visiting Hall of Fame’s website –

Comments? News tips? Click here to submit!

Trying to remember or locate a BEE advertiser? Click here to e-mail us, and we'll help!

Fair warning:  We have so many great photos on page 2 this month, it may take a while to load on slower connections!  If that applies to you, click the link below, then go get refreshment, come back, relax, and prepare to enjoy what we have for you on page 2!


Note to readers: At some point, this, our original Internet website, will be replaced at this web address by our new website, as part of the Community Newspapers group. At that time, you will still be able to access this long-established and smartphone-friendly website, if you save this address: You'll still have your choice of which one to visit!

Entire contents © 2019, THE BEE
; all rights reserved.

HTML Hit Counters
Hit Counters